How Do We Fix Tenure?
A hot topic of discussion in the news, political coliseum, and faculty rooms across the country is the concept of tenure. The term is often misunderstood by politicians, parents, and interest groups. Many think it is a way to protect incompetent educators. However, I suggest that it is fair a system of hiring and firing.
In an article entitled “Now Is The Time To Redefine Teacher Tenure” by Gary M. Chesley, tenure is stripped down and reformatted. Chesley first discusses the history of tenure up to present and how it has protected teachers from malicious intent of school boards, administrators, and politicians. He mentions several changes to clarify and improve the idea of tenure. These changes include executing three units of instruction over three years of employment, namely: writing three unit assessments, developing and executing an annual student management plan, receiving a minimum of three classroom evaluations, achieving student academic growth in specific skills, and keeping documented contributions that not only help themselves, but the school. After these requirements have been met, a tenure panel would review the information submitted by the teacher and decide whether or not to grant the teacher tenure. This would not only help teachers, but principals and often demonized unions (Chelsey, Gary 44-35).
I agree with the author. Tenure should be reformatted. However, I feel there can be even more improvements made. Previously in class, we discussed how teachers should be paid. I believe that tenure should include a possible appraisal or denial of monetary gain. If the teacher meets a percentage of the requirements listed above then pay, based on a configured pay scale, will increase. Probation of teachers and protection of teachers should also be reconfigured.
Currently, there is a probationary period of three years before a teacher is allowed tenure. This, I believe, can also be adjusted. Midway through the third year of the probationary period, the teacher should be evaluated by the appropriate administrator. Then, a meeting should take place. At this meeting, the evaluator should present the teacher with a specific improvement plan. If the teacher meets the requirements of that plan, he or she will receive tenure.
However, if the teacher does not meet the requirements, then the teacher will remain at the same pay level for the following year and not be allowed tenure in the fourth year. Midway through the fourth year, the evaluation process will be repeated. If the teacher still has not met the improvement plan recommendations then he/she will be terminated at the end of the fourth year. What is your opinion? Do you feel that tenure needs to be restructured and reconsidered? Let me hear!